Showing posts with label Coal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coal. Show all posts

Friday, September 18, 2020

Denyo and Toyota Developed a Fuel Cell Power Supply Vehicle That Uses Hydrogen to Generate Electricity

Denyo Co., Ltd. and Toyota Motor Corporation have jointly developed a fuel cell power supply vehicle that uses hydrogen to generate electricity. As a leading manufacturer of mobile (portable) generators, Denyo will work with Toyota to start verification tests with the aim of commercializing it. The project has been selected by Japan’s Ministry of the Environment as a “Low Carbon Technology Research and Development Program.”

Denyo and Toyota are both actively engaged in efforts for the global environment as they see related problems as important issues for management. As such, they have jointly developed the fuel cell power supply vehicle based on a belief that making efforts to apply fuel cell technologies to commercial and industrial vehicles is needed to further reduce CO2 emissions.

Together, the two companies have also pursued further possibilities wherein electrified vehicles, considered one important way that they can demonstrate their belief and provide back to society, are able to provide added value as a large-scaled power supply, delivering electricity when and where it is needed in a range of scenarios including disaster-stricken areas without power and entertainment venues such as outdoor concerts.

Many of the current generation of power supply vehicles use diesel engines to provide power to the vehicle on the road and when generating electricity. Using fossil fuels as energy, they emit substances of environmental concern when driving and generating electricity, including the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx). Fuel cell power supply vehicles, on the other hand, use fuel cells to provide power. This eliminates the emission of substances of environmental concern, enables up to approximately 72 hours of continuous power supply, and provides water for showers and other uses as a by-product of power generation.

The Toyota/Denyo fuel cell power supply vehicle that was jointly developed this time is based on Toyota’s Dyna light-duty trucks, equipped with the fuel cell system of Toyota's Mirai Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle (FCEV) as its power source. For its power supply unit, it uses a fuel cell power supply equipment developed by Denyo under a program subsidized by the Ministry of the Environment. The vehicle also carries about 65 kilograms of hydrogen (in 27 hydrogen tanks) for traveling long distances and generating power for long periods of time.

Verification tests for the vehicle will start in September 2020. It will be compared against conventional engine-based power generators to verify the unique characteristics of fuel cell power supply vehicles, including their impact on various load equipment and reductions of CO2 emissions.

Thursday, September 17, 2020

UND and PNNL Researchers Identified Unique Pathways & Pretreatments to Extract Rare Earth Elements From Low-rank Coal Ash

With the support of the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), researchers from the University of North Dakota (UND) and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) identified unique pathways and pretreatments to extract rare earth elements (REEs) from low-rank coal (LRC) ash.

LRCs such as lignites are one of the most abundant fossil fuel sources in the world. To understand the forms, associations, and partitioning of the REEs, along with other relevant elements and minerals in the ash samples, as well as their ash chemistry, mineralogy, and morphology, the research team conducted an extensive characterization effort.

Researchers produced a mixed REE concentrate that was greater than 2 percent by weight using ash samples from full-scale power generation stations and a pilot-scale combustion system at UND. The sequential extraction methods utilized by UND and PNNL are tunable and can be adjusted to accommodate the differences in LRC ash chemistries and physical properties for recovering REEs with maximum processing efficiency.

“NETL supports several research projects throughout the Nation with the goal of finding affordable ways to obtain the rare earth elements we need to keep our economy going,” said Anthony Zinn, NETL’s project manager. “The extraction method developed at UND offers a degree of flexibility which may make it attractive for potential users in the future, allowing the economy to grow while also disposing of fly ash from our existing coal-based power plant fleet.”

The researchers determined that if higher levels of REEs were in the initial LRC ash, the process could be economically viable even without further optimization, as long as additional high-value metals or critical minerals were recovered. Additionally, a simple water wash pretreatment of the samples can reduce the required amounts of acid for initial REE extraction from lignite ash. The pretreatment reduces costs and adverse environmental impacts while improving worksite safety.

This flexible REE extraction method was an outcome of a NETL-funded cooperative agreement intended to develop a domestic supply chain for REEs. REEs are vital for manufacturing personal electronics, energy infrastructure and defense technologies, and many other high-tech applications.

NETL is a U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratory that produces technological solutions for America’s energy challenges. From developing creative innovations and efficient energy systems that make coal more competitive, to advancing technologies that enhance oil and natural gas extraction and transmission processes, NETL research is providing breakthroughs and discoveries that support domestic energy initiatives, stimulate a growing economy, and improve the health, safety, and security of all Americans. Highly skilled men and women at NETL’s sites in Albany, Oregon; Anchorage, Alaska; Houston, Texas; Morgantown, West Virginia; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania conduct a broad range of research activities that support DOE’s mission to advance the national, economic, and energy security of the United States.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: National Energy Technology Laboratory

Element 1 Has Announced Plans to Create a Medium-duty Methanol-based Fuel Cell Truck

Hydrogen generation technology specialist Element 1 has announced plans for its methanol-based M-Series hydrogen generator to be incorporated onto a medium-duty fuel cell truck.

The company yesterday made the announcement in collaboration hydrogen-powered systems specialist Co-Win Hydrogen Power, a strategic partner and licensee of Element 1.

Extended road testing of the vehicle is currently underway in Asia, pushing forward the commercialisation of Element 1’s M-Series onboard hydrogen generation technology.

The M-Series produces no particulate matter in the generation of hydrogen, and when using methanol produced from waste gas streams, the solution is completely carbon neutral.

David Edlund, E1’s CEO, said, “To my knowledge, no other company in the world can provide a commercial onboard hydrogen generation product comparable to our M-Series product line.”


“Our broad collaboration with Co-Win is expected to result in the mass commercialisation of fuel cell systems, supporting not only transportation, but also telecom and distributed power applications throughout the Asian market.”

William and Ken Tag, Shareholders of Co-Win and Element 1, added, “We believe our onboard fuel cell system incorporating the Element 1 technology will provide clean and reliable power solutions for the Asian market which are also environmentally friendly and cost effective.”

“We look forward to working with both Element 1 and our Asian partners on this vehicle demonstration project and the ensuing large-scale commercial rollout of this unique and enabling technology.”

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: H2 View

Tuesday, September 15, 2020

DOE Announced $34 Million Funding for Small-scale Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems and Hybrid Electrolyzer Technology Development

Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the selection of 12 projects to receive approximately $34 million in federal funding under the funding opportunity announcement (FOA), Small-Scale Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems and Hybrid Electrolyzer Technology Development.

This FOA seeks to develop advanced technologies that can progress the present state of small-scale solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) hybrid systems using solid oxide electrolyzer cell technologies to a point of commercial readiness for hydrogen production and power generation. It also seeks validation of SOFC using syngas from gasification facilities.

“The Trump Administration is committed to making SOFC systems commercially available for hydrogen production and power generation. Selecting these projects for funding is a huge step toward that goal,” said Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette. “By working with National Laboratories, academic institutions, and private industry, we are combining a vast amount of knowledge and expertise to mature—and ultimately commercialize—these technologies.”

This research effort is part of DOE’s Office of Fossil Energy’s (FE) SOFC Program, which focuses on enabling the generation of highly efficient, cost-effective electricity from coal and natural gas with near-zero atmospheric emissions. The selected projects work toward the shared goal of ensuring an efficient and reliable electrical grid, while also protecting the environment.

“SOFCs are electrochemical devices that convert the chemical energy of a fuel and oxidant directly into electrical energy. They are unique in that they produce electricity through an electrochemical reaction and not through a combustion process,” said Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy Steven Winberg. “This means that SOFCs are much more efficient and environmentally benign than conventional electric power generation processes.”

The applicants identified for selection received the highest technical scores in their area of interest under the DOE FOA issued in May of this year. To learn more about the 12 selected projects, visit FE’s website.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: United States Department of Energy

Sunday, September 13, 2020

Why is Graphene Battery Better Than Lithium Battery?

History

Before graphene, there was graphite, and most of us know that as the “stuff pencils are made out of”. Graphite is a 3-dimensional compound and for the longest time, scientists have always theorized that graphene could be isolated from graphite in a 2-dimensional form. In 2004, two scientists, Andrew Giem and Konstantin Novoselov at the University of Manchester, created the first sample of graphene. The two were polishing a sample of graphite with tape and noticed extremely thin flakes stuck to the tape. This inspired them to create the thinnest sample possible and as a result, our friend graphene was born. This discovery took the scientific world by storm and in 2010, the two scientists won the Nobel Prize.

Properties

As crazy as it may sound, graphene is as critical to human civilization as bronze, iron, and plastics. For a compound so thin, yet powerful, specialists are dubbing graphene as a “supermaterial”. An entire world of physics and engineering will open up to a new era of advancements once graphene can be produced at a large scale.

Graphene is truly amazing because of its many properties. It’s over 100x stronger than steel, incredibly thin at only one atom thick, almost completely transparent, light as a feather, and the absolute perfect conductor of electricity and heat.  The strength of graphene is so mind-blowing, it was found that even 2 atomic layers of this material can be bulletproof. Yes, only two! These unique properties make graphene ideal for all kinds of electronic application and beyond. The limit to graphene is our own imagination.

Graphene Applications

Graphene is a near perfect conductor of electricity. This allows electricity to flow without hindrance. This dramatically slows the heating process lithium batteries face while allowing charging speeds up to 5 times as fast. This also increases the battery life by 5 times the charging cycles.

Graphene also evenly disperses heat acting as a cooling system. Graphene already generates less heat due to extremely low resistivity. But graphene also conducts heat evenly across battery to help cool the battery.



Why are current lithium batteries so limited?

To keep it plain and simple: HEAT. When a device is charging, heat is generated based on resistivity of conductor. Generated heat increases the resistivity of lithium. Since the lithium is hotter, the resistivity is higher, which means the device charges even more heat. All of this heat creates a positive feedback loop that can spiral out of control and cause the battery to literally burst into flames.


As you can imagine, this isn’t ideal, so to prevent from catching on fire, batteries will regulate the speed of charging, but this results in battery charging speeds to slowly crawl.



The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: Real Graphene USA

Could Graphene Battery for Tesla Happen?

Tesla has generated a lot of consumer interest with its Model 3 sedan — a US$40,000 car —  that the company believes will help make electric vehicles (EVs) available to the masses. Today, the Model 3 is the world’s best selling plug-in EV model, according to Statista, with worldwide unit sales of more than 300,000 in 2019.

Because Tesla’s electric vehicles run on lithium-ion batteries, which in addition lithium, also include graphite and cobalt. Demand for those metals is expected to increase as Tesla sells more of its electric vehicles.

But some investors are still wondering whether Tesla’s lithium-ion batteries may eventually include another interesting material; a single layer of crystalline allotrope within carbon known as graphene.

A battery is composed of a cathode and anode. The lithium-ion battery commonly contains a graphite anode. Graphene technology has the potential to be leveraged in lithium-batteries as a graphene electrode.

Although there has been some challenges in the reliability within these electrode materials, reduced graphene oxide — a solution of water and graphene — has been shown to display promising attributes within lithium-ion batteries.

In addition, when a metal oxide is attached onto graphene, the energy storage functions are markedly improved. Metal oxides are commonly used in lighting, magnets and superconductors, among other applications.

Is it a possibility? Read on to find out what could be in store from Tesla.

Graphene battery for Tesla: Could it happen?

Widely regarded as the “wonder material” of the 21st century, graphene has an impressive list of characteristics: it’s a better electricity conductor than copper, impermeable to gases, 200 times stronger than steel (but six times lighter) and almost completely transparent. Furthermore, its properties can be altered when chemical components are added to its surface.

Those qualities give graphene seemingly endless applications, though most still aren’t commercially available. But could graphene really be used to make better lithium-ion batteries? And if so, is that something Tesla is pursuing? The short answer is “probably not,” but there’s more to the story than that.

Here’s a brief overview of what you should know about Tesla and graphene:

  • 500-mile graphene battery: China’s Xinhua News Agency is largely responsible for rumors that Tesla may be making a graphene battery. Why? Back in 2014, the news outlet published an article stating that Tesla was working on a graphene battery that could nearly double the range of the Model S to 500 miles.
  • Tesla CEO Elon Musk chimes in: Xinhua’s story was given credence because around the same time it came out because Musk said that he thought it would be possible to create an electric vehicle with a range of 500 miles. “In fact we could do it quite soon, but it would increase the price,” he said. However, he didn’t specify that graphene would be used to create such a vehicle.
  • Market watchers pile on: Together, the article and comment from Musk understandably created an uproar in the graphene community — click here, here or here to get a sense of some of the commentary on the topic. Notably, market watchers pointed out that, while a graphene battery might be great for mileage, the cost of graphene could make it prohibitively expensive.
  • Excitement subsides: With no new reports on Tesla’s graphene plans, excitement about the 500-mile battery calmed down.
  • 330-mile peak: Sources show that Tesla batteries, produced by Panasonic (TSE:6752), have a maximum 330-mile range among its top-line models. The current battery electrodes are lithium-ion based.
  • Renewing activity again: In May 2019, Tesla announced that it acquired Maxwell Technologies. Notably, Maxwell offers fast charging capabilities through its supercapacitors. Graphene supercapacitors have the ability to store incredible amounts of energy compared to regular capacitors.
  • One million mile battery on horizon: Then, Musk reported that Tesla will be powering electric cars for 1 million miles across the lifetime of its li-ion batteries. In a study published in September 2019 by Dalhousie University, researchers suggested that a lithium battery composed of nickel manganese cobalt oxide (NMC) as its cathode and using artificial graphite, a structure of graphene, had significant viability. In the paper, physicist Jeff Dahn revealed the battery composite. This is especially rare, since researchers in rechargeable batteries and the graphene industry typically safeguard these results.

Graphene battery for Tesla: Current challenges

Unsurprisingly, there are a number of hurdles to the commercialization of using graphite materials in batteries. One, there are presently current density challenges, which impact the safety and strength of lithium batteries in EVs. Unresolved issues surrounding conductivity that ultimately degrade the overall battery capacity still remain as well.

Graphene battery for Tesla: The competition

That’s where the situation stands today. While a graphene battery from Tesla is certainly a compelling idea, as of yet there’s been no confirmation that the company actually has one in the works.

That said, there are other companies interested in the idea of graphene batteries that might someday power EVs. For example, major tech company Samsung (KRX:005930) is working on a graphene ball battery that could reduce charging times from 45 minutes to 12 minutes. Of course, investors are clamoring to know how soon this new development could be applied to the auto sector.

There’s also a startup from Spain called Earthdas that has developed a graphene battery that charges motorcycles and electric bikes in only five minutes. Again, people speculate that it’s only a matter of time before it can be used for other vehicles.

In early 2020, Spain-based Graphenano reported that together with a Chinese partner it is working to develop a graphene polymer-based battery that would allow for a range of up to 500 kilometers and the ability to recharge in less than 5 minutes.

Also in 2020, Chinese EV maker Guangzhou Automobile New Energy  announced that it has developed a graphene-enhanced battery that can be charged up to 85 percent in 8 minutes. Guangzhou believes the battery can be available for mass production as early as the end of this year.

In a further sign of development, Sila Nanotechnologies is developing a battery that bypasses the use of a graphite anode and instead replaces it with silicon. These silicon anode materials, in turn, have a charge rate that surpasses graphite cells. The company states that silicon anodes have the ability to absorb lithium ions at a faster rate than graphite due to the fact that they have a higher energy density.

In line with this, Enevate is a firm that is developing silicon-based lithium batteries, which it claims have superior technology compared to graphene materials.

“We can sustain a charge rate 10 times as fast as a conventional graphite cell,” Robert A. Rango, CEO of Enevate, told CNBC.

As a graphite anode surface area is prone to cracking, this negatively impacts its ability to store energy. Silicon, on the other hand, can adapt to a large surface area.

Overall, it would appear that Tesla is not the final answer on the graphene battery. But graphene is considered the “wonder material” of the 21st century; if Tesla wants to keep up with the competition, it’s possible graphene batteries may be a part of the company’s future.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: Investing News

Where Graphene Can Be Used in Energy Storage Components?

Graphene is a material that has been touted for many applications, both low-tech and high-tech. While it may take some time to make it into many electronic devices as a conductive medium/printable circuitry, it has started to gain a lot of attention and commercial viability in the small-scale energy storage systems, such as batteries and capacitors, which are used in many electronics. In this article, we’re going to look at where graphene can be used in energy storage components.

Graphene is a material that shouldn’t need much introduction if you’re here reading this article. For those who are unaware, graphene is a 2D material composed of all carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice (much like chicken wire or honeycomb). Many people tout it as a single atomic layer—which it technically is—but in the real-world, it can come in many forms from single-layer to multilayer and even in thinner ribbon-like forms (which are known as nanoribbons). Most graphene forms exhibit a very high electrical conductivity and charge carrier mobility, as well as a high stability to temperature, chemicals, and other stimuli, so it is these properties that have enabled it to gain a lot of interest across various energy storage devices.

Batteries

Graphene-based batteries are the most widely developed energy storage device that uses graphene and have not only been extensively tested in the academic laboratory (in various forms) but are now being produced commercially by some companies within the industry. So, even though the adoption from the end-user markets has taken some time (as it does with any new material that is to be trialed in batteries due to long-term safety requirements), the ability to make them commercially is starting to produce graphene-based batteries in the real-world through the likes of Samsung (who are the biggest company to use graphene) and other smaller battery manufacturers.


Schematic of basic synthesis procedure.
Graphene films are converted from coal tar pitch on the top and bottom surface of Ni layer at 1100 °C for 4 min under low vacuum and a reducing atmosphere.

Graphene, like graphite, is used in the electrodes. However, it’s not often that an electrode is purely made of graphene (there are some exceptions in the academic world), as it is often used in conjunction with graphite to form hybrid electrodes. In some cases, the graphene can be coated on to the surface of graphite electrodes, with one well-known example being the use of Samsung trialing ‘graphene balls’ in electrode coatings. If the original developments from the academic lab are anything to go by, graphene has the potential to be used across many different battery types—and not just Li-ion batteries—to improve the efficiencies, stability, and cycle/discharge cycle rates of the batteries.

Capacitors/Supercapacitors

Capacitors, and supercapacitors (sometimes referred to as ultracapacitors) is another area where graphene is making its way into. The main reason for using graphene is that it has a high surface area, stability, and conductivity (as well as charge carrier mobility) can be utilized to accumulate and store charge—which is the fundamental mechanism of energy storage in capacitors. Of all the capacitor types, graphene has shown the most potential in supercapacitors as they can be used in the carbon coatings on the capacitor plates (instead of activated carbon) to form an efficient electric double layer coating. These supercapacitors can then be used to store large amounts of energy.

While supercapacitors are not utilized as widely as batteries and other capacitors (due to a higher cost compared to conventional capacitors), there is the possibility of supercapacitors experiencing a significant growth increase over other energy storage systems in the next few years, as they could become the more-preferred option in electric vehicles over batteries. As it stands, many different companies graphene-based supercapacitors commercially, so the supply will be there if this demand increase does materialize.

Battery-Capacitor Hybrids

While it is not as common as the two areas mentioned above, another area has emerged which combines both batteries and capacitors into a single hybrid device. As mentioned above, one of the reasons why supercapacitors have not been widely used compared to conventional capacitors and other energy storage mediums is down to cost. One way of reducing the cost has been to create hybrid storage devices which utilize the strength of Li-ion batteries with the rapid charging ability of supercapacitors.

This has been achieved so far by integrating graphene-based supercapacitors into Li-ion modules to increase the lightweightness, energy density, charge, and discharge cycle rates, and stability against the appropriate individual constituents. It’s an area which is relatively new compared to the other energy storage areas, but the benefits achievable could see it grow in the future—especially in areas such as electric vehicles which could benefit from the properties of both batteries and supercapacitors, all while utilizing the properties of graphene.

Thursday, September 10, 2020

Japan's Companies Announces Kobe Kansai Hydrogen Utilization Council

Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha Ltd announced that K LINE has participated in the Kobe Kansai Hydrogen Utilization Council founded together with the companies involved in various hydrogen-related projects with the goal of the implementation of a hydrogen society as well as development of hydrogen supply chain in the Kobe Kansai area. 

Kansai area is one of the most advanced area in the world where various world’s leading projects concerning hydrogen supply and utilization are currently underway including the hydrogen supply chain pilot project with the effective utilization of brown coal in Australia conducted by CO 2-free Hydrogen Energy Supply-chain Technology Research Association, demonstration project of hydrogen cogeneration system at Kobe Port Island, and investigation on the possibilities for the introduction of hydrogen-fueled power generation.

In order to accelerate these efforts to achieve a hydrogen society as well as “Basic Hydrogen Strategy” and “Strategic Roadmap for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells” published by the Japanese government, the companies promoting hydrogen-related business have joined and founded the Council. 

The member will conduct feasibility study in pursuit of the large-scale utilization of hydrogen in 2030’s by way of unifying experience acquired through existing projects and business resources owned by companies operating in Kobe/Kansai area. 

The Agency for Natural Resources and Energy at the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization and Kobe City which is participating in Hydrogen CGS will support the activity of the Council as observers.


The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: Steel Guru

Wednesday, September 9, 2020

An Truck Require a Battery 10 Times the Size and the Weight, Making Hydrogen the Only Viable Alternative

Twenty years ago DaimlerChrysler revealed a “zero-litre car” — a hydrogen-powered Mercedes NECAR 5 that would help drive the industry out of the fossil fuel age and establish the Stuttgart-based carmaker as a “market leader in fuel cell technology”

But in the decades since, fuel cell technology has made way for the battery-powered electric car — at least when it comes to passenger vehicles. In April, Daimler abandoned its remaining hydrogen car, instead concentrating its fuel cell efforts on a joint venture with Volvo to develop emissions-free trucks.

Rival Volkswagen, despite maintaining a small research arm in its Audi brand, has long argued that hydrogen technology is too complex and expensive.

Yet even as the country’s top carmakers reverse away from fuel cell car development, chancellor Angela Merkel’s government is intent on turning Germany into a hydrogen superpower.

In July, Berlin revealed its National Hydrogen Strategy, earmarking €9bn for investment in the technology, which transport minister Andreas Scheuer said would give the local automotive industry “fresh prospects for the future and help secure a great many jobs”.

The VDMA, which represents Germany’s mechanical engineering sector, says hydrogen investment offers the country — which lags many Asian economies when it comes to battery cell technology and solar expertise — a unique opportunity.

“We are still in pole position globally here and can map the entire value chain in Germany and Europe,” says Hartmut Rauen, the organisation’s deputy general manager.

Many of the family-owned Mittelstand groups that form the backbone of the German economy already have the necessary expertise for electrolysis and hydrogen storage, the VDMA says, but need solid commitments from the government to attract the necessary investment.

A VDMA study found global sales of hydrogen-powered vehicles are expected to increase from 1m to 10m between 2030 and 2040

While hydrogen fuel cells can be used to power ships, trains and forklifts, as well as for industrial activities, the VDMA expects passenger cars to form the largest market.

A July study carried out for the VDMA suggested that global sales of hydrogen-powered vehicles will increase from 1m to more than 10m between 2030 and 2040.

But Germany’s homegrown car manufacturers show no sign of wanting a piece of that pie, and there are only 85 hydrogen fuelling stations in the country serving 750-odd hydrogen vehicles, according to McKinsey, a consultancy.

“We have a chicken and egg problem with hydrogen fuel cell technology,” says Axel Rücker, who runs BMW’s fuel cell department. 

“As long as the network of refuelling stations for hydrogen-powered cars is so thin, the low demand from customers will not allow for profitable mass production of fuel cell vehicles,” he says.

“And as long as there are hardly any hydrogen cars on the roads, the operators will only hesitantly expand their refuelling station network.”

In passenger transport, battery electric cars remain the right technology for the road to CO2-free mobility - Kurt Sigl, BEM

Opposition to hydrogen from within the carmaking sector remains strong.

“In passenger cars and light commercial vehicles, hydrogen cars are economic and ecological nonsense,” says Kurt Sigl, of the Federal Association for eMobility, BEM, whose members include some of Germany’s largest car part suppliers.

“In passenger transport, battery electric cars remain the right technology for the road to CO2-free mobility,” he adds.

The limited scope for further investment in the wake of the Covid-19 crisis has hardened auto executives’ opposition to the technology.

With VW alone spending €33bn on developing more than 70 battery electric models over the next few years, the industry — which is also investing in the rapid expansion of the charging infrastructure and battery cell production — can hardly afford to simultaneously develop hydrogen vehicles, the BEM argues.

“At the end we have to focus,” Markus Schäfer, chief operating officer of Mercedes-Benz, told a PwC conference in July. “What is the most efficient way to get green electricity to power a drivetrain?”

Faced with ever-stricter EU emissions regulations, and the prospect of large fines for failing to comply, carmakers claim they cannot afford to wait until hydrogen generation becomes more affordable, or more green.

“A hydrogen car requires energy from three or four times as many windmills than an electric vehicle needs for the same distance, making it three to four times as expensive to travel the same distance,” VW Group boss Herbert Diess told the PwC conference.

“That’s why more and more manufacturers are moving away from fuel cells.”

Ferdinand Dudenhöffer, the director of the Centre for Automotive Research in Duisburg, says that even the core argument for fuel cell cars — the ability to refuel within minutes rather than wait hours for a charge — was beginning to erode.

“In battery technologies, we see advancements that give them a longer life, which allows them to be recharged faster,” he says. Mr Dudenhöffer predicts that generating green hydrogen would remain too expensive to compete with the cost of running an electric car for many years to come.

An average truck would require a battery 10 times the size and the weight of that found in a standard Tesla, making hydrogen the only viable, emissions-free alternative - Bernd Heid, McKinsey

Yet backers of hydrogen say cost parity is closer than imagined, especially for long-distance journeys.

“The ecosystem of hydrogen is much wider than just cars,” says Bernd Heid, an expert at McKinsey.

“The fuel cell won’t be developed for the passenger vehicle alone,” he adds, arguing that the cost of electrolysis will go down as hydrogen production is scaled up for trucks and industrial use.

An average truck would require a battery 10 times the size and the weight of that found in a standard Tesla car, Mr Heid says, making hydrogen the only viable, emissions-free alternative.

In the short term, however, Germany’s car manufacturers are unlikely to be persuaded to push fuel cells forward.

“If you have funding for only one technology,” Mr Heid says, “you cannot skip battery electric vehicles.”

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: FT.com

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

Where Australia Can Focus Hydrogen Investment to Get the Best Bang for Buck?

For 50 years hydrogen has been championed as a clean-burning gas that could help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The idea of a “hydrogen economy” is now enjoying a new wave of enthusiasm — but it is not a silver bullet.

Amid the current hydrogen hype, there is little discussion about when the technology can realistically become commercially viable, or the best ways it can be used to cut emissions.

Australia must use hydrogen intelligently and strategically. Otherwise, we risk supporting a comparatively energy-intensive technology in uses that don’t make sense. This would waste valuable renewable energy resources and land space, increase costs for Australians and slow emissions reduction.

Here’s where we can focus hydrogen investment to get the best bang for our buck.

Hydrogen sucks up energy and space

Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, but rarely is it freely available. It must be unlocked from water (H2O) or fossil fuels such as methane (CH4), then compressed for transport and use. These steps waste a lot of energy.

To be transported, for example, hydrogen must be kept under high pressure or extremely low temperature. And in terms of energy storage, even heating up stones is more efficient.

Australia could become a renewable energy superpower in the future. But there are serious medium-term challenges, including constraints in the infrastructure that transmits energy.

The world must reach net-zero emissions within 30 years to avert the worst climate change. That means using renewable energy as efficiently as possible to maximise emissions reductions and minimise the land space required. So we must be strategic in how and where we use hydrogen.

Use hydrogen in places electricity won’t go

In most applications, renewables-based electrification has emerged as the most energy efficient, and cost-effective way to strip emissions from the economy.

Yet there are some industries where electrification will remain challenging. It’s here renewable hydrogen — produced from wind and solar energy — will be most important. These industries include steel, cement, aluminium, shipping and aviation.

A renewable hydrogen export market may also emerge in the long-term.

Renewable hydrogen will also be important to replace existing hydrogen produced by fossil fuels. But this alone will require a significant increase in electricity generation, to reach net zero emissions by 2050. This is a major challenge.

Hydrogen pathways. Staffell et al 2018. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system.

What about cars and trucks?

Road transport is one area where we believe hydrogen will not play a major role. In fact, Telsa founder Elon Musk has gone as far as to call hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles “mind-bogglingly stupid”.

Hydrogen vehicles will always consume two to four times more energy than battery electric vehicles. This is simply due to the laws of physics, and cannot be resolved by technological improvements.

In the case of hydrogen-powered vehicles, this will mean higher costs for consumers compared to battery-electric vehicles. It also means far more space for solar panels or wind turbines is needed to generate renewable energy.

What’s more, electric vehicles already have longer driving range and continuously expanding charging infrastructure, including ultra-fast chargers.

Most global car makers have recognised the lack of advantage for hydrogen cars and instead invested about US$300 billion in the development and manufacturing of electric cars. Toyota and Hyundai — the last main proponents of hydrogen cars — are also ramping up efforts on electric cars.

As for trucks, the US Department of Energy does not expect hydrogen semi-trailers to be competitive with diesel until around 2050, mainly due to the high cost and low durability of hydrogen fuel cells.

While hydrogen trucks may have a role to play in 20 to 30 years, this will be too late to help reach a 2050 net-zero target. As such, we must explore energy-efficient options already widely deployed overseas, including electric trucks, electrified roads and electrified trailers.

A truly strategic plan

If Australia is serious about climate action, we must focus efforts on where renewable hydrogen can deliver the greatest environmental and economic benefits: regional ports.

Hydrogen derived from fossil fuels is currently used to make products such as fertiliser and methanol. Supporting the transition to renewable hydrogen for these uses will be an important first step to scale up the industry.

If produced at regional shipping ports close to aluminium, steel or cement plants, this will provide further opportunities to expand renewable hydrogen use to minerals processing, while creating new jobs.

As hydrogen production scales up and costs fall, excess hydrogen would be available at ports for fuelling ships — either directly or through a hydrogen derivative like ammonia. Hydrogen gas could also be used to make carbon-neutral synthetic fuel for planes.

If an international export market emerged in the future, this strategy would also mean renewable hydrogen would be available at ports to directly ship overseas.

Finally, if the development of hydrogen truck technology accelerates before 2050, renewable hydrogen would be available to power the significant number of semi-trailers that travel to and from shipping ports.

Let’s get real

Renewable hydrogen is a scarce and valuable resource, and should be directed towards sectors most difficult to decarbonise.

U.S. Department of Energy Invests $72 Million to Support the Development and Advancement of Carbon Capture Technologies

Today, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) announced the award of approximately $72 million in federal funding to support the development and advancement of carbon capture technologies under two funding opportunity announcements (FOAs). Under this cost-shared research and development (R&D), DOE is awarding $51 million to nine new projects for coal and natural gas power and industrial sources. DOE is awarding a total of $21 million to 18 projects for technologies that remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, a process known as “direct air capture.”

“The projects selected as a part of this research will help us develop the technological solutions needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” said Secretary of Energy Dan Brouillette. “This is critical to balancing our Nation’s energy use while continuing to lead the world in emissions reductions.”

Through DOE’s Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage R&D Program, the Office of Fossil Energy has a comprehensive portfolio of technological solutions that help keep CO2 emissions out of the atmosphere. Many of these R&D efforts can be applied across both the energy and the industrial sectors.

“The primary mission of our office is to ensure that the United States can continue to rely on its fossil fuel resources for clean and secure energy. The advancement of carbon capture technologies, including direct air capture, contributes to that mission,” said Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy Steven Winberg. “Our ultimate goal is to mature these technologies so that they can be commercialized and brought to market.”

Under the first FOA, Capture Research and Development (R&D): Engineering Scale Testing from Coal- and Natural Gas-Based Flue Gas and Initial Engineering Design for Industrial Sources, DOE selected nine projects to receive $51 million for cost-shared R&D. These efforts aim to design initial engineering studies to develop technologies to capture CO2 generated as a byproduct of manufacturing at industrial sites.

DOE also selected 18 projects to receive $21 million under the second FOA, Novel Research and Development for the Direct Capture of Carbon Dioxide from the Atmosphere. These projects will focus on the development of new materials for use in direct air capture and will also complete field testing. 

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Demand for Hydrogen in Northwest Europe Could Rise to Between 200 TWh and 700 TWh by 2050

Demand for hydrogen in Northwest Europe could rise to between 200 TWh and 700 TWh by 2050 under low and high demand scenarios, Aurora Energy Research said Sept. 1 in a report covering the energy systems of Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.

The first applications for low-carbon hydrogen would be as feedstock for chemicals and refineries, and for new processes in steel and cement production, the report said.

Production of blue hydrogen, made from reforming natural gas with carbon capture and storage, would be "much cheaper" than that for green hydrogen, produced from electrolysis using renewable electricity, until into the 2040s, the report said.

Blue and green costs would only converge around 2045, Aurora said, electrolyser stack cost reductions being offset by rising power prices over the forecast period.

Aurora put levelized costs of production in 2020 (HHV, real, 2018) at around Eur40/MWh (Eur1.6/kg) for conventional H2, Eur50/MWh (Eur2/kg) for blue H2 and Eur80/MWh (Eur3.2/kg) for green H2.

S&P Global Platts on Aug. 27 assessed conventional hydrogen (Dutch, SMR including capex, carbon) at Eur1.24/kg, blue hydrogen (SMR with CCS, including capex, carbon) at Eur1.31/kg and green hydrogen (PEM electrolysis including capex) at Eur3.43/kg.

"Large-scale electrolysis should be jointly deployed with seasonal hydrogen storage and renewables power generation to assure low operational costs," Aurora said.

Using the conventional generation mix in German electrolysis, meanwhile, did not delivery carbon benefits over blue hydrogen again until the 2040s.

Based on average power system emissions, H2 produced by electrolysis becomes less carbon intensive than blue H2 only after 2045 in Germany, the report said.

CCS close to cluster source

Meanwhile, carbon capture and storage applications close to continental European clusters should be explored, Aurora said.

"There are important industrial clusters where domestic CCS is more economical than H2 imports from Norway," it said.

Dutch reservoirs provided the cheapest CCS today, while German reservoirs came at similar costs, but with significantly higher capacity if the process was to be accepted.

"We need vast amounts of storage, even with all salt caverns converted into H2 storage, electrolysers are exposed to high power prices," the report said.

Inter-continental transport of H2 via new pipelines or shipping should be minimized because of the costs involved, it said.

"Invest in localized production or re-purpose existing gas networks, albeit at extra cost," the report advised.

S&P Global Platts Analytics' H2 global production database identifies 1 GW of announced electrolyzer capacity set to come online across the next five years, 52% of which by end-2022.

There are 162 CCS projects active globally, 31% of which are in the US, according to Platts Analytics' Aug. 24 H2 Market Monitoring report.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: S&P Global

Japanese Shipping Firms Are Set to Develop and Commercialise High-power Hydrogen-powered Fuel Cell Vessels

A group of Japanese firms including oil refiner Eneos aims to begin pilot operation of a high-power hydrogen fuel cell passenger ferry at Yokohama port in 2024, eyeing the development and commercialisation of a hydrogen value chain for domestic coastal shipping in Japan.

Japanese shipping firm NYK Line, Eneos and engineering firms Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) and Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions are set to launch a demonstration project this month to develop and commercialise high-power hydrogen-powered fuel cell vessels. The project aims to develop a 150/gross-tonne hydrogen fuel cell passenger ferry for the planned trial beginning in 2024.

NYK Line will manage the whole project, while also assisting in a ship design and legal compliance. Toshiba will install a high-power fuel cell system on ships and develop operation technology, while KHI will be in charge of developing an onboard hydrogen supply system and energy management system. Japanese classification society ClassNK will co-operate in the safety assessment of the developed vessels.

Eneos is responsible for developing a hydrogen fuel supply system to demonstrate hydrogen supply in the pilot operation. The company, formerly known as JXTG, has strengthened efforts to shift to low-carbon energy, such as hydrogen and renewables.

Eneos has been actively expanding its hydrogen production and supply infrastructure, hoping to tap potential growth in hydrogen use for automobiles and ships. The company and power venture Jera in late August jointly opened a large-scale hydrogen supply station in Tokyo with an on-site facility to produce hydrogen from city gas piped from the Ohgishima City Gas Supply facility, a joint venture of Jera, Eneos and gas utility Osaka Gas.

Eneos operates 43 hydrogen stations nationwide. The company is also in an Australian-Japanese venture to export to the Japanese market hydrogen produced in Australia from coal.

Japan is working to commercialise zero-carbon emitting vessels in 2028-30 as part of efforts to reduce the global shipping industry's emissions. Shipping firm Mitsui OSK Lines is also co-operating with electric ship developer e5 Lab to develop a hybrid car carrier equipped with a hydrogen fuel cell system.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: Rieko Suda - Argus Media

Monday, August 31, 2020

NETL Have Developed a Low-cost Membranes to Separate CO2 From Nitrogen in a High Volume of Flue Gas

National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) researchers have developed a method to custom-formulate low-cost membranes to more effectively separate carbon dioxide (CO2) from nitrogen in a high volume of flue gas. This ability to achieve both high selectivity and high permeability during post-combustion carbon capture operations is one of the most difficult problems facing membrane researchers today. The NETL group solved the challenge by chemically binding multiple membrane components with different critical properties into one high-performance material that can be easily scaled up to reduce the costs of large-scale carbon capture operations.

The work, which was recently featured in the journal Cell Reports Physical Science, builds upon the lab’s expertise developing mixed matrix membranes (MMMs), which combine sturdy polymers with inorganic crystalline particles that enhance selectivity and permeability. Prior work looked at integrating metal organic frameworks (MOFs) to create two-component MMMs, but this research takes the process a step further by fabricating three- and four-component MMMs, known as multicomponent mixed matrix membranes (McMMMs).

“Highly permeable membranes tend to have lower selectivity and vice versa. And very few membrane materials, even two-component MMMs, are capable of breaking the permeability-selectivity tradeoff,” NETL Research Scientist, Sameh K. Elsaidi, PhD, explained. “By formulating our membranes using multiple-component MMMs, we’ve opened a whole new realm of possibilities to enhance compatibility and gas separation performance.”

The research produced 10 different composite membranes featuring components selected for enhanced compatibility, permeability, selectivity and mechanical stability.

“Compatibility between the different components is especially important to the formulation,” Elsaidi added. “We optimised this interfacial compatibility by selecting MOFs with open metal centres that can strongly interact with the functional groups of the polymers, resulting in the formation of uniform, well-blended, defect-free MMMs.”

“We used density functional theory computations to show that the interactions between the polymer functional groups and the open metal centres were quite strong,” commented Janice Steckel, PhD, who also worked on the project. “We believe these strong interactions between the metal centre and the polymer minimises phase separation and contributes to the great separation performance of these composites.”

As part of this work, the NETL team also estimated the cost of carbon capture using each of the 10 custom-formulated membranes, with the lowest cost being US$55/t, which is a substantial cost savings from the current average of US$65/t, and represents a significant step towards meeting the US Department of Energy’s goal of US$30/t CO2 by 2030.

“While this research only encompassed 10 composite membranes, the approach we have developed has opened the door to a new exploration route for myriad MMMs with unique formulas and new state-of-the-art performance,” Elsaidi said.

This is not the first time the NETL team has tackled the permeability-selectivity tradeoff. Elsaidi and the other researchers in NETL’s Functional Materials Team have also recently developed a highly permeable carbon capture membrane through a dual-layer process.

“We believe that the membranes we are developing here at NETL represent the next generation of post-combustion carbon capture technologies,” Elsaidi said. “The work we’re doing is making a real difference in bringing down the cost of carbon capture, and that means a stronger energy foundation for the nation and better environmental sustainability.”

The research team included NETL researchers Sameh Elsaidi, PhD, Surendar Venna, PhD, Ali Sekizkardes, PhD, Janice A. Steckel, PhD, James Baker, PhD, John Baltrus, PhD, and David Hopkinson, PhD, along with Mona Mohamed, PhD, from the University of Pittsburgh.

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

Click Here! Top Clean Coal Contractors for Power Plant, Gasification, Liquefaction and Emission Control System

Source: World Coal