Thursday, February 6, 2020

Fabrication of Carbon-ceramic Composites by Using Fly Ash & Carbon Fibers as Reinforcement

Abstract

Carbon-ceramic composites were fabricated by using fly ash and PANOX fibers as reinforcement. Fly ash, because of its small size particles e.g. submicron to micron level can be effectively dispersed along with fibrous reinforcements. Phenolic resin was used as carbon precursor. Both dry as well as wet methods were used for forming composites. The resulting composites were characterized for their microstructure, thermal and mechanical properties. The microstructure and mechanical properties of composites are found to be dependent on type of the fly ash, fibrous reinforcements as well as processing parameters.

The addition of fly ash improves hardness and the fibers, which get co-carbonized on heat treatment, increase the flexural strength of the carbon-ceramic composites. Composites with dual reinforcement exhibit about 30-40% higher strength as compared to the composites made with single reinforcement, either with fly ash as filler or with chopped fibers.

1. Introduction

Fly ash, a ceramic powder produced from coal based thermal power plants consists of mainly hematite, magnetite, mullite, quartz, and amorphous oxides [1]. These constituents occur mostly as spherical particles with diameter less than 25 μm. The results demonstrate that with exception of complex plerospheres, individual particles are chemically fairly homogeneous, but the pronounced compositional variation exists among particles with similar physical and structural attributes. X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the mineralogical constituents of samples extracted from different locations are similar with respect to the phases present and differ only in the relative amounts of those phases [2]. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that fly ash contains an assemblage of carbon particles remained unburned during combustion of coal [3-5]. Magnetite particles formed from the melt which are highly porous in nature, constitute around 4-5%. The Cenospheres comprise 0.5-1.0-weight % of fly ash. This byproduct of thermal power plants with interesting properties is being utilized in various applications e.g. as a  resource material for extracting various metals, magnetic particles, cenospheres etc. and as a raw material for various high temperature ceramics, acid resistant bricks, floor  and wall tiles, mineral wool, sintered pozzolona aggregates, building distempers, ash alloys etc.

Newer areas of applications of fly ash are in vogue now a days. The addition of carbonaceous precursor to the fly ash can result in carbon-ceramic composite with good mechanical properties. In the present work efforts have been made to utilize the small spherical size and abrasive nature of the particle to develop carbon ceramic composite using thermo- setting polymer as matrix precursor and short PANOX fibers as additional reinforcement. Since fly ash is a multioxide system in which oxides such as silica (SiO2), Alumina (Al2O3) and Iron oxide (Fe2O3) are present in appreciable amount while other oxides like TiO2, MgO, CaO, and Na2O etc are present in small amount, it is envisaged that the addition of carbonaceous precursor to the fly ash on heat-treatment at high temperature (greater than 1450ºC) can result in formation of metal carbides with good mechanical properties.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials used

Fly ash was obtained from Thermal Power Plant, Ahmedabad, India. This fly ash was analyzed for its chemical composition, particle size distribution and surface morphology. Chemical composition of fly ash was determined through standard chemical methods. Particle size distribution of the fly ash was measured by sedimentation technique under laser using particle size analyzer PSA 2001. Surface feature and shape of the particles were observed under scanning electron microscope Hitachi S 3000N. Two-stage phenolic resin powder with hardener obtained from Gujarat Phenolic Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. Baroda was used as carbonaceous matrix precursor. Stabilized PAN fibers were also used as reinforcement. These were characterized for their surface oxygen complexes by Boehm’s titration method. 

2.2. Procedure 

The raw materials, viz fly ash, PAN-OX fiber and phenolic resin were mixed by using two methods, dry powder method (PR) and wet solution method (SR).

2.2.1. Dry Method

In the dry powder method, milling of the raw materials was carried out for uniform distribution of precursors in the mixture. Powder mixture was pressed in a die under 300 Kg/ cm2 pressure and then cured at 130ºC-150ºC temperature. Rectangular green composite blocks of size 150×30×5-7 mm were prepared. Table 1 gives details of the nomenclature and composition of different reinforcing materials and matrix in the composites used in present studies. The green composite samples were  carbonized with  heating rate of 30ºC/hr with dwell time of 1 hour at 1000ºC. Carbonized composites were further heat-treated at  1500ºC with heating rate  of  300ºC/hr and soaking period of two hours under inert atmosphere. 

2.2.2. Wet Method

Fly ash and chopped fibers were first dry mixed and then together transferred to phenolic resin/methanol solution. The mix was stirred well till thorough mixing was obtained. This mixture was oven dried at  60-65ºC to remove  solvent. The dry powder mixture was pressed in a die under 300 Kg/cm2 pressure and then cured at 130ºC-150ºC temperature. Rectangular green composite blocks of size 150×30×5-7 mm were prepared. These green composites samples were heat treated  up to 1000ºC at  heating  rate of 30ºC/hr with dwell time of 1 hour under inert atmosphere. 

Table 1. Description of composites prepared

2.3. Characterization

The samples were characterized for their physical properties e.g. density and open porosity. Open porosity was determined using kerosene infiltration method. Bulk densities were determined from geometrical dimension and mass of the samples. 

2.3.1. Optical microscopy

The samples were embedded in epoxy resin and polished with SiC papers of different grade. Fine polishing was performed using alumina powder with particle size 1 μm, 0.3 μm and 0.05 μm. Polished surface was observed for the distribution of fly ash particles and fibers in the carbon  matrix by using LABORLUX 12 POL S optical microscope.

2.3.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Surface morphology and interfacial bonding amongst constituents of the composites were observed in scanning electron microscope HITACHI S 3000N after coating the sample with conducting layer of Pt-Pd alloy through ion sputter Hitachi E-1010. 

2.3.3. FTIR analysis

The pyrolysis of the matrix in the composite and the chemical changes occurring during heat treatment of the composites were studied on spectrophotometer SHIMADZU FTIR-8300. KBr was used as reference. The samples were mixed uniformly with KBr by keeping KBr to sample ratio 1:100. The mixture was then palletized and analyzed by FTIR spectrophotometer.

2.3.4. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

Change in the phases during high temperature heat-treatment studies were carried out by powder X-ray diffraction technique using Philips X’ Pert with Cu Kα1 (λ −1.54056 Å) as a source. 

2.3.5. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis

Thermal stability of the composites heat treated at various temperatures was studied on thermal analysis system Metller TA 4000 with Mettler TG 50. Analysis was carried out in presence of air at heating rate of 20ºC/min up to 950ºC.

2.3.6. Flexural strength

The flexural strength of the composites was measured on Shimadzu AG-100KNG by three-point bend method. Span length to thickness ratio was kept at 16-20 and cross head speed was 0.5 mm/min. 

2.3.7. Rockwell Hardness

Rockwell Hardness of the composites was measured by digital Rockwell Hardness Tester TRSDM. Hardness measurement of composites heat-treated at 1000ºC was done using ¼ in steel ball indenter by applying primary load of 10 kg then 60 kg, the value known as HRL value. Hardness measurement of composites heat-treated at 1500ºC was done using ½ in steel ball indenter by applying primary load of 10 kg with subsequent application of 60 kg load, the value are thus known as HRR value. 

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of reinforcing materials

Specific gravity of the Fly ash is 2.19 and its chemical compositions are given in Table 2. Total weight percent of SiO2+Al2O3+Fe2O3 is 86.87% therefore according to ASTM C 618 this fly ash is of class F type. Particle size distribution  is given in Fig. 1, which shows that the maximum portion of the particles is of size lower than 10 microns. As evident from the SEM micrograph (shown in Fig. 2) the fly ash particles are predominantly of spherical shape. Others are fragments and lumpish particles. Carbon yield of the two stage phenolic resin is 61.47%. Surface oxygen complexes on PANOX fibers are given in Table 3. These are compared with surface oxygen complexes on carbon fibers. Hydroxyl groups, carboxylic groups and lactonic groups are in higher amount in oxidized PAN fibers as compared to PAN based carbon fibers. Thus, oxidized PAN fibers are more useful for the bonding in composites.

Table 2. Chemical composition of fly ash

Fig. 1. Particle size distribution in fly ash.

Fig. 2. SEM micrograph of fly ash.

Table 3. Surface oxygen complexes of the fibers

3.2. Physical Properties of composites

Physical characteristics of the composites prepared through solution route (SR) and powder route (PR) heat-treated at 1000ºC are shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 3a shows that the densities of composites prepared through solution method are lower than that of the composites made by dry powder method. Open porosity in composites prepared through solution method is found to be higher than that of the composites made through powder route (PR). As the amount of phenolic resin increases, the densities increase and open porosity decreases in both the cases. The porosity of the composite is known to affect the mechanical strength. Therefore in order to have composites having lower porosity, high density and high mechanical strength, the composites prepared through the dry method alone were taken for further studies at high temperature heat treatment at 1500ºC. It was predicted that the formation of metal carbides may improve the physical properties of the composites but detrimental reaction of the carbon matrix with metal oxides resulted in the porous  carbide composite. Thus as shown in the Fig. 3b open porosities of the composites heat-treated  at  1500ºC  are higher than those of the composites heat-treated at 1000 C and hence it gives poor mechanical properties. 

3.3. FTIR spectroscopy

Fig. 3. Physical properties of the composites  (a)  composites  made through solution route (SR) and powder route (PR) heat- treated at 1000 C and (b) composites made through  powder  route (PR) heat-treated at 1000ºC and 1500ºC.

FTIR spectra of the composites heat-treated at different temperatures are shown in Fig. 4. It show peaks at 1100 cm−1 ~1200  cm−1 and 500 cm−1 ~ 600  cm−1  attributed  to  Si-O stretching and alluminosilicates respectively. C=N stretching at 1591.2 cm was observed in milled powder due to acrylic fibers. Peak at 1506.3 cm−1 reveals the C-O stretching. Along with the Si-O stretching and alluminosilicate, the composite heat treated at 1000ºC show absorption at 1706 cm−1 due to presence of carbonyl groups. No peak for C=N stretching was observed in heat-treated composites. Additional peak at 854.4  cm−1  was  observed  for  the  Si-C  stretching.  These results indicate the formation of silicon carbide during carbothermal reduction.

3.4. Surface Morphology

Fig. 5 shows SEM micrographs of as mixed raw materials. Fig. 5a shows the fly ash particles alone well covered with resin particles. Fig. 5b shows uniform distribution of particles of milled powder and the fibers well covered with the resin particles.

The optical micrographs of the composites HTT 1000 C are shown in Fig. 6. These also show uniform distribution of the fly ash particles in the glassy carbon matrix. Optical activity is observed at the interface between fly ash particles and carbon matrix, revealing anisotropic behaviour in the carbon matrix. The presence of oxides of Iron e.g. hematite and magnetite in the fly ash contribute to the anisotropy  in the matrix at the interface between glassy carbon and surface of the particles [6].

Fig. 4. FTIR spectrograph of (a) as received Fly ash, (b) milled powder containing 60% fly ash and 20% phenolic resin 20% PANox  fibers,  (c)  composite  heat-treated  at  1000ºC,  and  (d) composite HTT at 1500ºC.

Fig. 5. SEM micrographs of the reinforcing materials and phenolic powder. (a) Milled powder without fibers and (b) Milled powder with fibers. 

Fig.  6.  The optical micrographs of  the composites Heat-treated   at 1000 C: (a) F622 with fibers and (b) F640 Without fibers.

Fig. 7 shows SEM micrographs of the composites made with fly ash and fibers after HTT at 1000 C. These show uniform distribution of reinforcements in glassy carbon matrix.  A comparison of micrographs of the reinforcing materials (Fig. 5) and of the composites heat-treated at 1000ºC (Fig. 7a) reveal not much change in the shape of crystalline particles. But it appears that on heat-treatment at 1000ºC, formation of partial liquid phase due to dissolution of glassy particles takes place (Fig. 7b). At higher temperature, sintering results in neck growth between micro sized particles as  the liquid phase formation and viscous flow sintering took place within fly ash particles [7].

Adhesion between fly ash particles and carbon matrix and cohesive bonding between fly ash particles themselves contribute to the strength of the composite at 1000ºC. A liquid phase sintering produces mullite grains in  comparatively very low amount and these are confirmed through XRD. A comparison with the equilibrium phase diagram of the Al2O3-SiO2 system reveals the formation of liquid phase at substantially higher  temperature  range  from  1550ºC  to 1850 C (8). Comparing this with present results suggests that the presence of the alkali metal oxides in fly ash shifts the pseudo eutectic point to a lower temperature [8].

Fig. 7. SEM micrographs of the composite F622 made with (a) 60% fly ash 20% phenolic and (b) 20% PAN ox fibers after heat-treated at 1000ºC.

Fig. 8 shows spherical fly ash particles getting converted into beautiful polyhedral geometry during reaction at high temperature (1500ºC). 

Fig. 8. SEM images of polyhedral structure formed in the composite (F622) heat-treated at 1500 C. 

3.5. X-ray Diffraction

Fig. 9a shows XRD spectra  of different  composites HTT at 1500ºC. It shows characteristic peaks of β-SiC having 2θ values as 35.65°, 60.04°, and 71.82°. Characteristic peaks of free carbon were not observed in composites containing 60% fly ash and 40% phenolic resin due to carbothermal reduc- tion reactions. Fig. 9b shows the diffractogram of the composites containing 60% fly ash 20% phenolic resin and 20% fibers HTT  1500ºC. The characteristic peak  of free  carbon was observed at 26.26o along with characteristic peaks of β- SiC indicating presence of substantial amount of carbon after carbothermal reduction. This peak was predominantly from the fibers which get co-carbonized and oriented when heat treated to 1500ºC. The XRD of  reduced  oxides shows  the presence of additional three peaks of iron carbides (Fe2C) at angles 37.4o (2.40 Å),  45.20o (2.04  Å) and 49.24 (1.84 Å). Presence of quartz and mullite phases was also observed in the composites heat-treated at 1500ºC. XRD data shows that two kinds of phenomena are appearing to be taking place simultaneously. One is reaction sintering of silica and alumina above 1200ºC and second carbothermal reduction of metal  oxides e.g. SiO2, Fe2O3  etc. with carbon to produce metal carbides.

3.6. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis

Fig. 10 shows TGA curves of the composites heat-treated at 1000ºC and  1500ºC in air. The composite heat-treated  at 1000ºC show onset of weight loss at 200ºC while composite fired at 1500ºC show onset of weight loss at 650ºC. Weight loss in composites heat-treated at 1000ºC is due to oxidation of carbon matrix while in composite heat-treated  at 1500 C, it gets converted to carbides which have better thermal stability and oxidation resistance. 

Fig. 9. X Ray diffractograms of Composite after heat treatment at 1500ºC: (a) composite containing 60% fly ash and 40%phenolic resin and (b) composite containing 60% fly ash and 20% phenolic resin 20% PAN ox fibers. 

Fig. 10. TGA in air of the composite containing 60% fly ash  and 20% phenolic resin 20% PANox fibers heat-treated at 1000ºC and 1500ºC.

Fig. 11. Flexural strength of the composite prepared with powder method with fibers heat-treated at 1000ºC.

3.7. Mechanical properties of the composites

Fig. 11 shows flexural strength of carbon-ceramic composites made with various compositions. As the weight percentage of the fibers increases, there is an increase in the strength of the composites. As the fiber percentage increases from 20-25% the breaking load increases by 100% and flexural strength get increased by 71.05%. When the weight percentage of the fiber increase from 25-40% the breaking load increases by 50% and flexural strength get increased by 35.12%.

The results of Rockwell Hardness of the carbon-fly ash composites heat-treated at 1000ºC and 1500ºC are given in Table 4. It shows that the hardness of composites heat-treated at 1000ºC decreases as the amount of fly ash increases. Composites heat-treated at 1500ºC also show opposite trend, i.e. an increase in hardness on addition of fly ash. However, the percentage increase in strength of the composites when heat-treated from 1000ºC to 1500ºC decreases  with increase in fly ash content. In fibrous composite, the hardness is more than that of the composite without fibers at 1000ºC. At high temperature, a decrease in hardness is observed. The decrease in hardness of the composites (HTT 1500ºC) may be due to increase in porosity. 

Table 4. Rockwell hardness of the composites heat treated  at  1000ºC and 1500ºC

4. Conclusions

The carbon ceramic composites having desired mechanical properties can be obtained by using fly ash and carbon fibers as reinforcements in carbon matrix. Both get distributed uniformly and well bonded with carbonaceous polymeric precursor, and hence it gives composite with good mechanical properties on heat-treatment at 1000ºC. Heat-treatment at 1500ºC results in carbothermal reduction producing metal carbides like SiC and Fe2C. The carbothermal reduction also results in formation of pores in the composites that reduce hardness. Addition of fibrous reinforcement increases flexural strength, but the hardness of the composites heat-treated at 1000ºC decreases as the amount of fly ash increase  or  fibrous reinforcement decreases. In case of composites heat treated at 1500ºC, the hardness increases on increasing amount of fly ash, may be due to the formation of metal carbides. 

Source: S. Manocha and Rakesh Patel - Department of Materials Science, Sardar Patel University,

Advertisement

The 10 largest coal producers and exporters in Indonesia:

  1. Bumi Resouces
  2. Adaro Energy
  3. Indo Tambangraya Megah
  4. Bukit Asam
  5. Baramulti Sukses Sarana
  6. Harum Energy
  7. Mitrabara Adiperdana 
  8. Samindo Resources
  9. United Tractors
  10. Berau Coal

Click Here for Top World Clean Coal Technologies Contractors